Contact Us Now
for a Free Evaluation of your Personal Injury Case

Call 800-538-4878
or EMail us

Call 24 hours a day / 7 days a week / 800-538-4878 Free Slip and Fall Injury Case Evaluation

An "uninvited licensee" is a person who is privileged to enter the property of another for the purposes of convenience, pleasure or benefit. A licensee may enter the premises when the owner has given permission to do so and this distinguishes the licensee from the trespasser. The duty owed by the licensee is essentially the same as that owed to a discovered trespasser. The landowner must warn the licensee of a defect or condition known to the landowner to be dangerous when the danger is not open to ordinary observation by the licensee.

An "invitee" or "invited licensee" involves a situation where the owner or occupier of the land has led the visitor to believe that the premises are intended to be used for the purpose for which the visitor has in fact entered the establishment, and that such a purpose was contemplated and encouraged by the occupier in the design or arrangement of the premises. The duty of care owed to this class of persons is such that the possessor of the premises 1) must use ordinary care in a) keeping the premises in a reasonably safe condition and b) correcting dangerous conditions of which the owner knows or should reasonably know, and 2) must give timely notice of hidden or concealed perils that are known or should be known to the owner, but that are not known to the person on the premises. The owner or occupier of the premises must act as a reasonably prudent person would in maintaining the premises in a safe condition. The owner or occupier must undertake reasonable steps to repair any dangers of which the owner has actual or constructive knowledge.

A child who is injured while trespassing may still bring a suit against the landowner if the injury is caused by an artificial condition on the land and all of the following conditions are met: 1) The place where the condition exists is one on which the possessor knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass 2) The condition is one which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he or she realizes or should realize will involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to children 3) The children, because of their young age, do not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or coming into an area made dangerous by it 4) The utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the burden of eliminating the danger are slight as compared with the risk to children involved 5) The possessor fails to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or otherwise protect the children. Swimming pools are an example where this doctrine may come into play.